Post by account_disabled on Mar 10, 2024 9:27:27 GMT
In addition, a "reverse attorney's fee" is awarded among the trial costs. This is the fee paid by the losing party to the winning party's lawyer. Supreme Court Decisions in Deed Cancellation and Registration Cases In accordance with the precedent decisions in the title deed cancellation and registration case, it is possible to apply for witness statements in the title deed cancellation and registration case due to abuse of power of attorney. ... taken as a witness; It is stated that the testator stated that he wanted this place inherited from his father to be left to his brother in case of his death, and that he appointed himself as proxy, and that after the transfer, the defendant gave a large amount of money tied with a rubber band to the deceased, and from the records brought by completing the deficiency, the rental fees of the testator are 09.01.2008 - 06.04.
When the facts are evaluated together with the bank records that Germany Phone Number Data it was paid from the defendant's account between 2009 and 2009; It is concluded that the assignment was voluntary and that the power of attorney was not abused. This being the case, it should be decided to reject the case” (Y. 1. HD, 05.02.2020 T., 2016/15495 E., 2020/616 K.) In addition, a "reverse attorney's fee" is awarded among the trial costs. This is the fee paid by the losing party to the winning party's lawyer. Supreme Court Decisions in Deed Cancellation and Registration Cases In accordance with the precedent decisions in the title deed cancellation and registration case, it is possible to apply for witness statements in the title deed cancellation and registration case due to abuse of power of attorney. “In the statement of Attorney...
Taken as a witness; It is stated that the testator stated that he wanted this place inherited from his father to be left to his brother in case of his death, and that he appointed himself as proxy, and that after the transfer, the defendant gave a large amount of money tied with a rubber band to the deceased, and from the records brought by completing the deficiency, the rental fees of the testator are 09.01.2008 - 06.04. When the facts are evaluated together with the bank records that it was paid from the defendant's account between 2009 and 2009; It is concluded that the assignment was voluntary and that the power of attorney was not abused. This being the case, it should be decided to reject the case” (Y. 1. HD, 05.02.2020 T., 2016/15495 E., 2020/616 K.)
When the facts are evaluated together with the bank records that Germany Phone Number Data it was paid from the defendant's account between 2009 and 2009; It is concluded that the assignment was voluntary and that the power of attorney was not abused. This being the case, it should be decided to reject the case” (Y. 1. HD, 05.02.2020 T., 2016/15495 E., 2020/616 K.) In addition, a "reverse attorney's fee" is awarded among the trial costs. This is the fee paid by the losing party to the winning party's lawyer. Supreme Court Decisions in Deed Cancellation and Registration Cases In accordance with the precedent decisions in the title deed cancellation and registration case, it is possible to apply for witness statements in the title deed cancellation and registration case due to abuse of power of attorney. “In the statement of Attorney...
Taken as a witness; It is stated that the testator stated that he wanted this place inherited from his father to be left to his brother in case of his death, and that he appointed himself as proxy, and that after the transfer, the defendant gave a large amount of money tied with a rubber band to the deceased, and from the records brought by completing the deficiency, the rental fees of the testator are 09.01.2008 - 06.04. When the facts are evaluated together with the bank records that it was paid from the defendant's account between 2009 and 2009; It is concluded that the assignment was voluntary and that the power of attorney was not abused. This being the case, it should be decided to reject the case” (Y. 1. HD, 05.02.2020 T., 2016/15495 E., 2020/616 K.)